Apple vs. Microsoft

Serious discussion about news, politics and whatever is on your mind.

Moderator: Forum Guards

Postby rob » Tue Apr 14, 09 11:04 pm

i have both

mac for designing and pc for play/surfing.

graphic designers for some reason use macs, so i got annoyed having to cross platform so i gave in and baught both
________
ZX14 VS HAYABUSA
Last edited by rob on Fri Feb 18, 11 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
rob
Regular
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 05 4:44 pm

Postby Mr. Tastix » Wed Apr 15, 09 9:01 am

rob wrote:i have both

mac for designing and pc for play/surfing.

graphic designers for some reason use macs, so i got annoyed having to cross platform so i gave in and baught both


They do? Lol, I've noticed that myself actually. I still don't know why though.
Blood is thicker than water and sweeter than candy.
User avatar
Mr. Tastix
Forum Legend
 
Posts: 5247
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 05 6:10 am
Location: New Zealand

Postby Tantalus » Wed Apr 15, 09 12:26 pm

I can't stand seeing an office full of Macs in movies.

Because THAT's real to life! About 20, 1 grand computers for office work.
Last edited by Tantalus on Wed Apr 15, 09 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Signatures are dumb.

Image
User avatar
Tantalus
Forum Super Hero
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 08 1:23 am
Location: Bicycle Land

Postby Aidan » Thu Apr 30, 09 12:56 am

Do we honestly need to argue this topic?

Apple is great for design and innovation

Microsoft is great because of their OS that supports a wide range of hardware and software. After using 7, innovation is starting to look up for microsoft.

Remember the orgasms people had when so came out?! Well same goes for 7. I sure love it.
Psychokiller, spelled incorrectly.
User avatar
Aidan
CandyMan
 
Posts: 6270
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 06 8:57 am
Location: True North Strong & Free

Postby Mr. Tastix » Thu Apr 30, 09 1:27 am

People use Mac's alot in graphic design, and the only reason I've found out why is because the Mac platform is so much cleaner and easier to use and more intuitive than Windows. I can't say if this is true, I've never used a modern-day Mac but personally, I wouldn't switch for that reason.

Some person even said, which I thought was really stupid, that Mac's will run Photoshop better than Windows so long "as it has enough ram", what the hell is the point in said statement? Same goes for any bloody OS that can run Photoshop. You shove enough RAM and CPU power into it it's gonna run nice and dandy.

My only problem with a Mac, is that because a lot of people use it in graphic design (lots of the designers at my Polytech use Macs and we also have a suite full of the things) I'm going to have to conform to using it too. That'll be a bitch.
Blood is thicker than water and sweeter than candy.
User avatar
Mr. Tastix
Forum Legend
 
Posts: 5247
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 05 6:10 am
Location: New Zealand

Postby Dae » Thu Apr 30, 09 12:47 pm

~Psychotic~ wrote:Mac's will run Photoshop better than Windows so long "as it has enough ram"

Ironically, Mac runs Photoshop 10-20% slower than Vista. The problem is not due to the platform but Adobe, which didn't optimize Photoshop properly for it.

~Psychotic~ wrote:You shove enough RAM and CPU power into it it's gonna run nice and dandy.

I think those people meant that Mac OS X supports 64 bit applications, that means that they can use more than 4 GB of RAM. Most commonly used Vista — 32 bit — supports only up to 4 GB of RAM.
User avatar
Dae
Alpha
 
Posts: 12086
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 03 4:40 pm

Postby clyzm » Fri May 01, 09 1:49 am

3.25 GB I thought?
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby Aidan » Fri May 01, 09 5:06 am

cataclyzm wrote:3.25 GB I thought?


Good point. I wish 1.25Gb RAM sticks were manufactured so I'm not wasting money.
Psychokiller, spelled incorrectly.
User avatar
Aidan
CandyMan
 
Posts: 6270
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 06 8:57 am
Location: True North Strong & Free

Postby Dae » Fri May 01, 09 7:41 am

cataclyzm wrote:3.25 GB I thought?

Right.
User avatar
Dae
Alpha
 
Posts: 12086
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 03 4:40 pm

Postby Aidan » Fri May 01, 09 5:29 pm

I'd much rather just buy a DDR3 board.
Psychokiller, spelled incorrectly.
User avatar
Aidan
CandyMan
 
Posts: 6270
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 06 8:57 am
Location: True North Strong & Free

Postby Zondartul » Sat May 02, 09 11:40 am

All the Apples functions that do nothing usefull work 100%.

While only half of Microsoft functions that actually do something good work at all.

J/k.

In seriousness, everything Apple does is for comfort of the user (and user can't fuck up anything because he's not allowed to touch any of the inner workings). Apply things look shiny.
Majority of opensource commonities like Linux developers do is to give user maximum controll, letting them customise every aspect of functionality and inner workings. They give power, but only to those who have a good idea what they're doing.
Microsoft stays middle ground between functionality and ease of use. Windows can do much more than Apple's Macintosh or OS-X (and Iphone is an OS-X (sort of like a mac)), while being understandable by all users, not just "people who know what they're doing" of Unix/Linux systems.

I use Iphone because it's a phone that has a browser and wi-fi, and with some hacking I play pc version of Quake on it (not 2d scroller, an FPS :D). Well mostly cause it's handy for porn and wikipedia. Oh and Ipod feature helps alot.
I use Windows because I'm a gamer, but also because I'm not a computer illiterate person who can't figure out what "file cannot be read" means. I'm not a professional system admin though, so I don't use Linux. I simply can't figure out what I'm supposed to do there.

Apple wins where the only thing to worry about is user comfort. Microsoft makes not-so-pretty but functional things other people care to work on.

Am I right?
User avatar
Zondartul
Poster
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 04 7:27 am

Postby Dae » Sat May 02, 09 1:32 pm

Nio wrote:functional things other people care to work on

Many designers, programmers, system administrators choose Mac for their professional activity as well. Unlike Linux, it's a mature system which doesn't have any problems with a choice of software available for it, and drivers.

Additionally, Mac OS X is a Unix system, thereby it allows almost the same level of configurability as in any Linux system.
Last edited by Dae on Sat May 02, 09 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dae
Alpha
 
Posts: 12086
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 03 4:40 pm

Previous

Return to Rants & Debates

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests