[A]boveTheLaw wrote:lol at comparing computah games to sports.
Among certain people it is rather spread opinion, mostly because it is only now starting to be widely recognized as a form of sport.
However, such reckless a stab at a comparison, and not only a comparison, is silly. I would call you a moron, but I would be warned for doing so, so I will not lower myself to such offenses..
Let me bring you a simple example: i put an apple on the ground, and swing my stick at it while aiming at a random hole in the ground left behind by earlier construction work. It flies over a small bush, and in spite of treacherous weather, the apple lands nicely in the hole. It is called golf. Obviously this is NOT a sport. Notice the sarcasm.
So please, think before you label something. Anything that is competitive and takes some skill, regardless of the requirements behind that achievement, can be (and is) labeled as sport, once it gains wider attention.
I place physical sports before computer sports and any other sports that require more thinking and coordination/reflexes than physical contribution (even though all sports have these elements at different proportions), but that is just me. However, I certainly place computer sports before golf and any similar alternatives.
[A]boveTheLaw wrote:Also, I aimbot.
autoaim=9.999 isnt aimbot.