LTKJAY wrote:No, not at all. She was cold blooded.
Of course, she had a mechanical blood-cooler installed in her nipple.
Moderator: Forum Guards
LTKJAY wrote:No, not at all. She was cold blooded.
[A]ENKIDUDU wrote:Looks like a picture of Christ to me. Why would there be angels in greek mythology?
[A]ENKIDUDU wrote:My point was, there are no angels in greek mythology.
Tonnochi wrote:
LOL. The painting is Lament For Icarus. Angels are attending to Daedalus' son after he flies too close to the sun and the wax on his wings melt. The significance is ICARUS, not JC's initials .
This is the best analysis? I must SUCK.
cataclyzm wrote:[A]ENKIDUDU wrote:My point was, there are no angels in greek mythology.
Angels, no
deities, yes
Eros, for example
The Unbeholden wrote:Tonnochi wrote:
LOL. The painting is Lament For Icarus. Angels are attending to Daedalus' son after he flies too close to the sun and the wax on his wings melt. The significance is ICARUS, not JC's initials .
This is the best analysis? I must SUCK.
This guy actually did a really good job.
He didn't know the painting however.
you used your brain for once, i can commend on you on that.
But you didn't even know yourself that it was Lament of Icarus until you read it of the wiki page. so don't act like your smarter then this guy.
he pretty much did a almost flawless analysis, at least its not as pathetic as yours.
The Unbeholden wrote:He got a t-shirt because he was the first one to do an analysis that came to Eidos's attention. obviously it has everything to do with the saying "early bird gets the worm" sort of thing.
So basically He got a t-shirt for that, for how devoted he was.
How "good" a analysis has nothing to do with devotion.
And i'm getting pretty tired of all Aaron's idiotic friends spamming my youtube account and flaming insults on this thread. But i guess that's excepted. If you deal with one of them you deal with the rest.
I prefer to settle disputes with intelligence rather than annoyance. Guess that's not going to happen.
LTKJAY wrote:No, not at all. She was cold blooded.
~Psychotic~ wrote:The thing is, someone had to make that post on Wikipedia. Correct? That doesn't mean they did the analysis.
~Psychotic~ wrote:For all you know the information there could be wrong
~Psychotic~ wrote: even if it isn't, they most likely still would have seen Tonnochi's video to post speculation on the Wikipedia article.
~Psychotic~ wrote:The article was made AFTER Tonnochi's analysis and all it did was correct certain aspects of Tonnochi's video - AFTER he had made it.
~Psychotic~ wrote:And if we're idiotic then you must be fucken' brain dead, mate.
~Psychotic~ wrote:Please, just go troll some other forum that nobody gives a shit about. Your excuses me shit, Tonnochi was the first to put up his video whether or not the information provided was factful or not.
~Psychotic~ wrote:Do note that this was not an analysis made by a professional at making analysis', I assume so anyways. Tonnochi does not know everything, he is not perfect, he is not a bloody God. Just like you and Wikipedia isn't. Just like the guy who made the Wikipedia article isn't.
~Psychotic~ wrote:I don't think Tonnochi made the video based on facts to begin with anyway, I believe he did research and made it based on his own opinions. Or can't you understand that with the shriveled up brain you seem to have?
~Psychotic~ wrote:Don't you understand human logic? What are you, a machine? Do you, like most Artificial Intelligence (who are programmed to, I suppose lol), think of yourself as 100% accurate (even though we all know that's far beyond any truth)? Because guess what, you ain't so damn bright yourself Mr. Bigshot.
~Psychotic~ wrote:So what if it's the early bird catches the worm. Too fucken bad, eh? Guess your mate, the Mr. Wikipedia Editor didn't get there in time. Well guess what, that's just tough fucking shit isn't it.
~Psychotic~ wrote:If you can't keep up with the competition then the competition will wipe you out.