Page 1 of 1
Do you think lams and turrets should stay in [0]Aug

Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 1:36 pm
by ooooooooooooooooooo
I much preferred non aug with lams and turrets, it made the game more interesting. All i see thease days is sniper rifle/headshot/dead.
I think bringing turrets and lams back to non aug would make the game more interesting, clanwars would be more fun too. Most of the fun has been taken away, DX is being played by many players far to serious,
Fun always comes before winning.
Other ppl would say...just play augs...
Personally i dont like augs...
Clanwars were far more fun with turrets and lams, far more team stradegy to think, and fun protecting your base with turrets and placing lams on doors, they were the fun days for me, Yes i was a noob back then "ROFL" ....but admit, i had much more fun.
I vote bring back turrets and lams, what are you gonna vote.

Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 2:22 pm
by Dae
I could release a mutator that decreases lam damage and radius if needed. Then, the game with lams and turrets will be fair.


Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 2:43 pm
by Alistair
Its how it was originally played but augs with always pwn it


Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 2:43 pm
by Krieg
lambugging isn't funny

Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 4:00 pm
by Jeoh
NoChanc n00b.
There is no defense against LAMs in 0A. There is no defense against a turret in 0A, except hacking.

Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 5:13 pm
by AlexDenton
not turrets, cos Cathedral is un-playable with them
Lams tho


Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 7:37 pm
by Bob
I hate turrets in non-augs.
But Lam, maybe..

Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 8:10 pm
by Dae
GeneralJeoh wrote: There is no defense against a turret in 0A, except hacking.
Heard about emp grenades?


Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 05 8:53 pm
by -TheSpecialist-
AlexDenton wrote:not turrets, cos Cathedral is un-playable with them
Lams tho

If you took the time to look you would find a free emp in the cathedral and 2 in the cabinets, plus the turrets are slow so you should be able to avoid them without dying imo.

Posted:
Wed Apr 27, 05 12:09 am
by Trailmix
People think lams require no skill. Well, when someone is on my back, i always throw lams from behind. sometimes it misses, sometimes it frags. It takes skill to set mines (setting it so that they dont knw where they are so they cant disable them) and avoid them. They also bounce high and you can't cook em. They are also fun.
I definitely voted yes.

Posted:
Wed Apr 27, 05 1:34 pm
by Professor Layton
lams could be in, but I agree that the radius and damage needs to be a bit less, I prefer them out though.
And well turrets, I dont care if they're in or not, there are several ways to get around them.

Posted:
Wed Apr 27, 05 7:04 pm
by Jeoh
Lmao, throwing lams behind you. I just LAM jump!

Posted:
Wed Apr 27, 05 7:28 pm
by AlexDenton
-TheSpecialist[A]- wrote:AlexDenton wrote:not turrets, cos Cathedral is un-playable with them
Lams tho

If you took the time to look you would find a free emp in the cathedral and 2 in the cabinets, plus the turrets are slow so you should be able to avoid them without dying imo.
on bullet from a turret hitting you is dangerous in 0augs, cos that one bit less health may be the decidcer in a 1v1 melee fight

Posted:
Wed Apr 27, 05 9:57 pm
by clyzm
Lams are good - fun actually ;D

Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 05 3:12 pm
by Krieg
no , its no funn when many noobs are in the server , they always go straigthaway to the lams and lambug , or they hide at the places were they have put lams

Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 05 4:53 pm
by AlexDenton
i remember AUDI[TT] used to be simply impeccable with LAMs
he was just SO GOOD!