ShadowRunner wrote:I'm going to try and visit Eidos, a few miles from my house. I am a journalist after all, and I wish to ask them some questions.
Because obviously they will jump to it!
ShadowRunner wrote:I believe that even Eidos will not turn down the PR opportunities that exist if DX continues, it will enter the Guinness Book of Records and be a story in itself. Eidos do it for money not love, even they will see dollar signs in helping us...
I cant work out if your being sarcastic, or seriously believe this? I hope its not the later.
ShadowRunner wrote:Also with daily shootings in South London now, where Eidos is based, there is all the more reason to speak about a computer game that offers non-lethal solutions.
Not their problem, they just made the game, not police the world.
ShadowRunner wrote:The fact that Deja uses illegal methods to acheive his aims, including discriminating and excluding individuals and targeting individual IP's is all just gravy added to the pot...
Again, not their problem. They're not the internet police!
They made the game and announced they wish to have no further involvment in the multiplayer, hell they stopped supporting the SP a long time ago!
ShadowRunner wrote:The other thing I notice. Deja is doing a good job of proving he is incompetent at running servers without discriminating and excluding. He banned me for scoring more than 6 in one minute, but nowhere in the start up screen does it warn you.
3rd party game modification, they're not responsible for changes to a game they have signed off on. If they did happen to look into this and modifications to their content, I think [A] would be in alot more trouble for making the multiplayer aspect free without consent.
What did you originoally mail them saying anyway?