James wrote:Before I bother watching another "reading too far into it" analysis Aaron edition:
Does it simply just mention the dreams being two transhuman ideals or does Aaron go off his rocker nit picking everything.
He nit picks everything as it is and that's a
good thing, to be perfectly honest. I think in this particular part he is rather basic in the saying that the ideal of the dream has probably got some relation with transhumanism, and that it is a symbol of the old Icarus stories.
I don't really mind that, I find the idea pretty damn obvious anyway. It's after that when he starts showing us really in-depth crap like tiny text that interests me. Mostly like "how the fuck can he read that? What the hell does he use to read that shit?" and all the small details. I like the nit-picking, stating the obvious is stupid because it's
obvious.