Page 1 of 1

Haze

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 10:51 am
by James
I told you guys, it'll be shit. Free Radical need to learn to stop developing serious games that are clones of others. I hope they enjoyed their 4.5/10 from IGN of all people.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 2:18 pm
by Zantinzuken
Think the bro is going to give it a rent and see what the craic is. Timeshift 1.5 really.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 2:26 pm
by James
Snowblind 1.5 like Timeshift, Haze, Crysis...lol

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 4:11 pm
by Snakey
Zantinzuken wrote:Think the bro is going to give it a rent and see what the craic is. Timeshift 1.5 really.


Even the cover is similar.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 4:39 pm
by Tantalus
It's the same monotone formula for most FPS's nowadays except with a worthless twist. Plus Free Radical fail at coding vehicles.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 4:45 pm
by Mr. Tastix
You know, if people have such a problem with certain companies making games then why don't you go and do better, eh?

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 4:53 pm
by James
Snakey wrote:
Zantinzuken wrote:Think the bro is going to give it a rent and see what the craic is. Timeshift 1.5 really.


Even the cover is similar.


Yellow visors are in thanks to Halo.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 5:53 pm
by Tantalus
~Psychotic~ wrote:You know, if people have such a problem with certain companies making games then why don't you go and do better, eh?
I didn't say that. In fact I admire Free Radical a lot for their rich history and massive input in to the 64 bit onwards era.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 8:02 pm
by Spiderbot01
~Psychotic~ wrote:You know, if people have such a problem with certain companies making games then why don't you go and do better, eh?


Then why don't you go and make something better than all the stuff you complain about? Which is pretty much everything.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 8:05 pm
by Siva
~Psychotic~ wrote:You know, if people have such a problem with certain companies making games then why don't you go and do better, eh?


That "saying" was always fucking stupid.

Shit doesn't work like that, just because a man fucked up at what he did, doesn't mean no-one can say anything about it, at all, ever.

Haze was a fuck up and Free Radical have gone down a notch because of it.

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 8:14 pm
by Tantalus

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 08 9:42 pm
by xProtocol Rain
Meh, played the demo. Hated it.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 08 3:40 pm
by Tantalus
Completed it in under 3 hours; incredibly boring when you're a rebel.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 08 6:21 am
by Aidan
I loved Haze. I can agree the demo sucked because it was the first level (which sucked). The Demo released on PSN was the demo first shown in mid-2007 before the graphics update (which is on the released game). The graphics were actually really good (not as good as some games, but still good). The story was actually pretty good (with a sort of twist at the end with Marino saying all the lines the Duvall said meaning there is no right side). The controls were good, and the Multiplayer is INSAINLY fun (FreeRadical is good for that i.e. Timesplittlers). It takes about 3 hours to beat on easy, 7 hours on normal, and 12 hours on hard.


With more negative reviews than expected, you can tell Free Radical are going to work their asses off on Haze 2 and Timesplitters 4. The only things currently out about Haze 2 is the fact the Derek Littlewood is thinking about something along the lines of Organic vs Inorganic. That is all. Remember, you destroyed the landcarrier, but not the corperation.

Overall I think it deserves at least a 7.5/10

By the way Jay, ign gave assasins creed a 6.5 while giving army of two a 7.9

And when ign released their COD4 review (being 9.5), Halo 3's rating (Being a 9.5 before COD4 came out) magically went up by 0.1 prior to the COD4 review release.


IGN DEFINATLEY DOES NOT TAKE BRIBES

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 08 8:43 am
by James
By the way Jay, ign gave assasins creed a 6.5 while giving army of two a 7.9

And when ign released their COD4 review (being 9.5), Halo 3's rating (Being a 9.5 before COD4 came out) magically went up by 0.1 prior to the COD4 review release.


Why did you just prove me right? lol.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 08 7:44 am
by Aidan
Jay.. sometimes I'd like to know whats going on inside your head...

[youtube]sA-451XMsuY[/youtube]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 08 9:26 am
by James
Common, fucking, sense is what it is.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 08 9:40 am
by Aidan
Myself? Or Barrack?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 08 9:51 am
by James
They're harsh to those who they don't receive bribes for. No one is a credible reviewer, stop that at once.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 08 6:20 pm
by Tantalus
LTKJAY wrote:They're harsh to those who they don't receive bribes for. No one is a credible reviewer, stop that at once.
Even my saviour, Gamer TV, gave Army of Two a 9/10.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 08 12:38 pm
by Siva
Played it multiplayer the other day

Somewhat more enjoyable, unless you're a fucking rebel, then prepare to be mowed the fuck down. Bots are retarded and stand in one place all day. FPS in a full 16 person match never goes higher than 20 from what I've seen, which is pretty awful.