Deus Ex Alpha

Cool
Fucking
Story
Bro

Remember that topic I posted 2 years ago and you ALL ignored it?, well most of the general public did too. Ever wondered why we can't watch some videos on youtube?, download demos if we're from certain countries>, visit some fucking WEBSITES?

Thanks to the ignoring public we're going to have to deal with so many blocks on the internet. I'm not going to rave or rant on I'm just going to push "I told you so" in front of your faces. Enjoy your Sky Digital PC.

Actually, I knew about Net Neutrality a while back and have watched videos on it. I just don't care to rub it in peoples faces or complain about it, because we, the people of the internet, have already lost.

I believe in Net Neutrality because I believe it ties in with the Human Right to Freedom. And I am a strong believer of the Human Rights (read- Human, I don't think these Rights should expand to any convicted criminal because they, to me, automatically lose all rights when they break the law) but Internet Service Provider's have the freedom to do what they want, it's their business, not yours.

You can't just give a little and take everyone. Same goes for ISP's actually. They do the same thing: Give a little and take everything (our money). There needs to be a middle ground, will there be one? Maybe. Who knows.

As for websites blocking access themselves, get over it. That's called tough luck. Like I said, that ties in with freedom, it is their website, their business, they pay for it and they run it. They can do what they like with it. If someone started coming up to me and telling me how to run my website I'd tell them to fuck off. Or would you just succumb to the will of every man?

dick

it was going to happen whether we liked it or not, quit bawwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Protocol wrote:dick

it was going to happen whether we liked it or not, quit bawwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Yeah pretty much. But I still believe the Governments can do something about it, in regards to Internet Service Providers. Not to individual businesses and websites that threaten Net Neutrality though, that to me is just Freedom and it's extremely contradictory.

On one hand there is the Freedom to view what we want, when we want, online or off. But on the other hand, at least in my eyes, there is the Freedom for a business to do what they want, when they want, to their own business, both examples within the law. We have freedom under the Human Rights Act (or we should) and businesses do too since it's their own business and they run and manage it.

I don't understand what this means, can you explain it to me?

Dextruktor wrote:I don't understand what this means, can you explain it to me?

The internet is turning into channels, like a TV.

We're not going to be interacting with it.

James wrote:

Dextruktor wrote:I don't understand what this means, can you explain it to me?

The internet is turning into channels, like a TV.

We're not going to be interacting with it.

I still don't understand what that means...
What changes will it do to us, simple users of internet?

We would be posting messages like these, for one.

There won't be instant messaging services.

There will only be 120+ websites per country, all bought as spaces as channels.

No online gaming.

BASICALLY, JUST A TV.

James wrote:We would be posting messages like these, for one.

There won't be instant messaging services.

There will only be 120+ websites per country, all bought as spaces as channels.

No online gaming.

BASICALLY, JUST A TV.

Ooooooh, FUCK!

James wrote:There will only be 120+ websites per country, all bought as spaces as channels.

This is a bit of an exaggeration. There may be a bit less then that, and most will be affiliated with the ISP. The rest is an exaggeration because that's what ISP's will do, control the internet. They will just force you to keep quiet pretty much, and to me, that's illegal.

I believe what the ISP's are doing, what the governments are letting them do, is incredibly illegal. I'm pretty sure it's against the Human Rights Act: The Right to have Freedom. What is freedom if we cannot state how we dislike someone? Or how we do not like a service or a product a company gives?

What is freedom when we cannot have the right to view online things, at our own disclosure? So, I'm all for one for Net Neutrality, but the governments have to get off their asses and do something now. Not when they find out their own sites are blocked.

We've become so technologically advanced, the internet and all it's programming is one of those advancements. Why the hell do people want to take it away so bad? Are too many "powerful" individuals scared that the majority are talking? Are screaming out how bad that person or company is? Sounds like a government, doesn't it?

We, the people, are good when you need us, to vote for you, or pay you. But as soon as the people who are in power get that power, they want more. The ISP's, the governments, they forget one thing: We ARE their power. Without us, they are NOTHING.

Examples of videos/websites that are blocked in the UK?

Baleout wrote:Examples of videos/websites that are blocked in the UK?

It's not the point that they're doing it in all countries, the most prominent case of it I believe is in China, where their Human Rights is so fucked up anyway it's simply not surprising. I can't tell if it happens here because any site that's blocked I clearly don't view.

I believe it happens in the US, because if it wasn't such a problem over there nobody would be complaining about it, making videos about it or wanting whoever wins the Presidential Election to change it.

It's not the point that they're doing it in all countries

What?
I was just asking because of...

Ever wondered why we can't watch some videos on youtube?, download demos if we're from certain countries>, visit some fucking WEBSITES?

I read about blocking in China. Something called the "Golden Wall", or was that in Korea?
Also I thought it wasn't happening in the US, but it was coming close and that is the reason for the videos etc?

On Youtube I frequently find videos saying "This is not available in your country" :/

James wrote:We would be posting messages like these, for one.

There won't be instant messaging services.

There will only be 120+ websites per country, all bought as spaces as channels.

No online gaming.

BASICALLY, JUST A TV.

Sure is EXAGGERATING AROUND HERE

Protocol wrote:

James wrote:We would be posting messages like these, for one.

There won't be instant messaging services.

There will only be 120+ websites per country, all bought as spaces as channels.

No online gaming.

BASICALLY, JUST A TV.

Sure is EXAGGERATING AROUND HERE

Not really no.

Deal w/ the truth, they want to make it like Sky Digital.

James wrote:

Protocol wrote:

James wrote:We would be posting messages like these, for one.

There won't be instant messaging services.

There will only be 120+ websites per country, all bought as spaces as channels.

No online gaming.

BASICALLY, JUST A TV.

Sure is EXAGGERATING AROUND HERE

Not really no.

Deal w/ the truth, they want to make it like Sky Digital.

You're like those people saying the world's gone PC mad

Ron Paul

Edit:

Jay is not overexaggerating, actually

This is a very big problem in the US

Comcast (my ISP) has recently announced they will make bandwidth limitations from other countries and they are blocking torrents.... and shit

It's like superhighways in the USA. It detaches the rural areas.

It's like NAFTA

Whatever the hell that is

The Nigerian Academy of Film and Television Arts?

~[A]Kaiden~ wrote:On Youtube I frequently find videos saying "This is not available in your country" :/

Yeah, so do I, not that you mention it. And that would be an example of it. I have no idea why Google do that, what the fuck is the difference? I could just switch my IP to a different country and watch it. Makes no difference to me, so why bother?

As long as when I go to play Crysis Wars there is one server with more than 15 people in it, I am amused

http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/ ... ernet.html

YES