Moderator: Forum Guards
Kaiden wrote:Well Windows 7 seems similar to Vista, so it was probably more like a base for 7.
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:Vista was like a beta for the beta.
Tutorial for Control Panel partitioning:
http://www.alohatechsupport.net/webdesi ... indow.html
~MainMan~ wrote:I'm just sticking with XP
Believe me, if you have a "dated" PC, Windows 7 is of NO benefit to you whatsoever. But for slaves of Vista, this is a breath of fresh air.~MainMan~ wrote:I'm just sticking with XP
Psychotic wrote:
I have no doubts in my mind that Microsoft will make us pay for Windows 7, so if that is the case, why bother calling it a Service Pack 2 for Vista? Service Packs have been free, and always have been as far as I have been concerned, and they should be. But if 7 is not free, then they shouldn't refer to is as a Service Pack, simple.
Protocol wrote:Psychotic wrote:
I have no doubts in my mind that Microsoft will make us pay for Windows 7, so if that is the case, why bother calling it a Service Pack 2 for Vista? Service Packs have been free, and always have been as far as I have been concerned, and they should be. But if 7 is not free, then they shouldn't refer to is as a Service Pack, simple.
MS are doing a free upgrade if you bought Vista after a certain time last year. That is a huge step for MS imo.
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:Was also thinking about dual-booting with Mac OS X.