Page 1 of 1
Monday Night Combat

Posted:
Mon Feb 07, 11 11:43 pm
by Tantalus
Contemplating a purchase. Anyone played it?

Posted:
Mon Feb 07, 11 11:44 pm
by ynnaD
REAL MEN DON'T BUY NEW GAMES
THEY PLAY THE SHIT OUTTA THE GAMES THEY ALREADY HAVE
Re: Monday Night Combat

Posted:
Mon Feb 07, 11 11:50 pm
by James
Tantalus wrote:Contemplating a purchase. Anyone played it?
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA
DOTA

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:03 am
by Aidan
All it is, is an unnecessary TF2 copy/remake in 3rd person, BY a 3rd party dev.
TOO MANY 3's.
2 is better than 3.
I'll stick to tf2.
Save your money for more important things


Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:10 am
by Baleout
It's badly designed, poorly animated, unfunny TF2.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:13 am
by Aidan
Yeah, UberEntertainment isn't so Uber. They effed themselves forever releasing this game.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:16 am
by James
it's nothing like tf2.
it's red vs blue dota as a shooter

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:20 am
by Tantalus
James wrote:it's nothing like tf2.
it's red vs blue dota as a shooter
The idea of a tower defence shooter sounds quite appealing.
Also, have you played it Baleout?

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:38 am
by James
Tantalus wrote:The idea of a tower defence shooter sounds quite appealing.
Tower defence and dota are shit.
Badly optimised unreal 3 engine int he mix????????????????????????????????????
woops
also bale has.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:41 am
by Tantalus
James wrote:Tower defence and dota are shit.
Badly optimised unreal 3 engine int he mix????????????????????????????????????
bale has.
One's man's trash...
Just wanted to see if his opinion was a justified one.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 12:45 am
by ynnaD
ynnaD wrote:REAL MEN DON'T BUY NEW GAMES
THEY PLAY THE SHIT OUTTA THE GAMES THEY ALREADY HAVE

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 2:17 am
by Aidan
James wrote:it's nothing like tf2.
it's red vs blue dota as a shooter
The concept of copying tf2 player classes and creating shittier player models with the same attributes.
Yes, your right though, the gameplay is different.
-as in shit.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 8:40 am
by James
one thing that confused me
Aidan wrote:3rd party dev
what

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 9:56 am
by Tantalus
Steam is apparently a console now!!!

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 9:36 pm
by Aidan
What I was trying to say, was that it wasn't Valve that made MNC.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 9:43 pm
by James
Valve didn't make Team Fortress either.
Oh shit???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 9:45 pm
by Baleout
looks like aidan just got BUSTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
D

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 9:50 pm
by Aidan
They Deleloped, and published Team Fortress 2.
I have not once mentioned Team Fortress Classic.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 9:54 pm
by James
but you implied it was a first party title (it isnt)
steam isnt a platform either, even microsoft/apple games wont be considered first party titles for pc
you implied mnc is a third party title for steam
tf was not created by valve, valve merely produced a sequel and own the ip, but it's still not entirely theirs, such as, dota?
in your pretend world and mixing it with actual logic, tf2 is ultimately a 3rd party title
this is you trying to cover up your tracks
this is me typing in lower case
analysis: BUSTED

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 10:08 pm
by Aidan
Yes, steam is not a platform. TF2 is ultimately 3rd party. What I'm trying to say in Aidan language, is that MNC could have been good if valve had created it.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 10:12 pm
by Baleout
Aidan wrote:MNC could have been good if valve had created it.
They already did.
It's called Team Fortress 2.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 10:14 pm
by James
<s>Aidan</s> Aiden, now that is just more silly to me!
Are you implying if it simply was the exact same game with "VALVE" plastered to it or the game made kinda like it is but Valve changing stuff around it would be better? If it was any more like the current state of TF2 (as you implied) I would dislike the idea of a DOTA shooter even more.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 10:20 pm
by Tantalus
At least MNC is more balanced than TF2.

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 10:23 pm
by James
AHAHAH
+1

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 11:43 pm
by Aidan
Valve's Team Fortress is fun, where as MNC is not as fun!

Posted:
Tue Feb 08, 11 11:46 pm
by James
TF2 is definitely not fun at the moment.
edit: This isn't even an opinion, the game is so convoluted and unplayable by the over-support. Fact.

Posted:
Wed Feb 09, 11 12:28 am
by Aidan
No, it is an opinion.
I find TF2 very fun.

Posted:
Wed Feb 09, 11 12:30 am
by James
Let me make this easier for you:
TF2 is definitely not fun at the moment.
This isn't even an opinion, the game is so convoluted and unplayable by the over-support. Fact.
Or maybe I'm a pretentious prick who set the post up like that to make you react wrongly? The game is very plagued by complexity and very poorly balanced, a solid majority will tell you this and the reason why would be given as too much variety, they're really killing their game with too much content.

Posted:
Wed Feb 09, 11 12:35 am
by Aidan
While I can agree with the fact that it is unbalanced, and has too far of a variety.
The game is still fun to play in my opinion. Nobody has to care about my opinion, but I find it fun.