Page 1 of 1
Regarding the warnings

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:16 pm
by Survive.
Ok, I have seen people being warned countless times today.
But some are very, very pathetic. But most warnings are used for the best.
----
Gishank wrote:So you warned him for spamming..,....

*Wonders if Alex is turning crazy..... Well, crazier*
He was just messing, and he gets one warning. Sorry, but I do find some people a bit to tight with warnings, and just loves to give them out. Maybe he did go over the top a bit, I am just saying. Some people take stuff other ways than other people, so I will understand if you start warning me...
----
Here is another one, he was just trying to prove a point. I really don't understand...
----
Just pointing it out, sorry.
Dan.

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:26 pm
by Zantinzuken
Danny was spamming and, although trying to prove a point, he was just fanboy'in up a topic unrelated to what he was talking about.
In short: He was getting another "PS3 IS DA BEST" post in because there's a lot of 360 users on this forum. Flame baiting etc.
I can't say much about the klop one, but he deserves a warn for that bloody computer topic as it is...

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:26 pm
by James
About Danny's.
Of course I warned him, I told him to shut up because he was bringing a flamewar into a topic without a flame.

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:28 pm
by Survive.
Ok, now I understand the Danny one.
But what about the rest of the topics. Some of them are pathetic, do you think the same?

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:37 pm
by James
Oh yeah I delivered Klop's didn't I, off topic while it was in rant section.

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:44 pm
by Survive.
Oh ok. Sorry, but as I said, some are a bit not asked for.

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:45 pm
by ~SaSQuAtCH~
¤[ß2S]¤Sürvívë wrote:Ok, now I understand the Danny one.
But what about the rest of the topics. Some of them are pathetic, do you think the same?
yea but its some kind of moderator communism here, i mean if you are not a moderator you are "nothing"
I'm saying it because many moderators spam several times and dont get anything and still they warn people even in spam section for spamming!


Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:51 pm
by Professor Layton
That topic you're referring to wasn't originally placed in spam, I believe.

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 5:55 pm
by Kaiden
Also Moderators/Admins/Members of [A] are still warned, just in forums you can't see.


Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 6:56 pm
by {17}~Rob~
Its still hypicritical on this forum. (spelling?)

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 9:12 pm
by ~SaSQuAtCH~
Clix wrote:That topic you're referring to wasn't originally placed in spam, I believe.
It's not the only one.

Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 9:51 pm
by Survive.
But why is the reason you move it to spam? So you can spam in it yourself?


Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 07 10:52 pm
by Kaiden
{17}~Rob~, lol, then don't post here if you don't like it. Also, please explain how we are hypocritical =D.
¤[ß2S]¤Sürvívë, some topics are requested to be kept open but are off-topic, so they are moved, some topics are split from other topics that have gone off-topic. Some topics are made in the wrong place like "OMG I JUST SAW THIS GUY IN THE STREET I HAVEN'T SEEN IN 4 YEARS", placed in Deus Ex, is moved to Spam. I prefer placing a topic in General Chat.
DeathMaster, please point out atleat 3 topics where this has occured so we may investigate this further, if not, please stand down.

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 9:24 am
by ynnaD
Why bother arguing? There's no point of us 'lower' users arguing, because we are insignificant compared to the higher 'authoirty' around here such as the famous members of the forum and mods and admins, there isn't any point arguing, even if we are right in a rare occasion, because we will just get warned or banned.

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 5:15 pm
by ~SaSQuAtCH~
~[A]Kaiden~ wrote:DeathMaster, please point out atleat 3 topics where this has occured so we may investigate this further, if not, please stand down.
No I won't.
It's like you kill somebody and you say you are innocent because you've got to kill
3 people to be a criminal. rofl. I hope you get what I mean.
We both know that the moderation system doesn't work as perfect as you think or want to think. Now all you have to do is face it and try to solve it.


Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 5:21 pm
by Kaiden
Lol, if everyone obeyed the rules there wouldn't be a need for a warning system, if you want to spam go on 17 or RTK, as they don't have rules against it.

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 5:31 pm
by ~SaSQuAtCH~
I did NOT say that the warning system is needless, I said that it's abused.

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 5:59 pm
by Kaiden
It keeps order, seems fine to me. You need 4 warnings to get banned, if you manage to get 4 warnings you clearly haven't read the rules or are trying to get yourself banned.

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 5:59 pm
by {17}~Rob~
You got banned for that post this morning? NO.
Also Kaiden u avoid the question, would I of been warned for that post I quoted?

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 6:00 pm
by James
{17}~Rob~ wrote:You got banned for that post this morning? NO.
All admins did.
Get with the times.
This is also a excuse that we get equally punished like idiots who claim this hilarious butt hurt stuff.

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 6:37 pm
by ~SaSQuAtCH~
~[A]Kaiden~ wrote:It keeps order, seems fine to me. You need 4 warnings to get banned, if you manage to get 4 warnings you clearly haven't read the rules or are trying to get yourself banned.
So you say that if I get warned by MODERATOR ABUSE, it doesn't matter? (It happened only once anyway?) What if i get 4 warnings that way? Grow up man.

Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 8:27 pm
by {17}agentsmith
look i think theres been more then enough people complaining about moderatorship on this forum to merit it being looked into at least
and don't bother saying "if you dont like it post somwhere else" thats a cheap way of defending yourselves
im not for a minute saying all mods on here are bad but im saying that the system should defo be looked over
in fact all three of my warnings were off one person in partcular, after i raised this with him he repeatedly insulted me, bearing in mind all my warnings were for silly things this makes it even worse
in fact one of the warnings was given because i was laughing at a joke he made and didnt put a long enough comment


Posted:
Fri Oct 26, 07 11:45 pm
by Kaiden
DeathMaster wrote:~[A]Kaiden~ wrote:It keeps order, seems fine to me. You need 4 warnings to get banned, if you manage to get 4 warnings you clearly haven't read the rules or are trying to get yourself banned.
So you say that if I get warned by MODERATOR ABUSE, it doesn't matter? (It happened only once anyway?) What if i get 4 warnings that way? Grow up man.
Actually most people here just dislike you because your posts consist of spam and flame.
look i think theres been more then enough people complaining about moderatorship on this forum to merit it being looked into at least
Yes, I believe so. The Moderating will be looked over, although I can't guarantee any change to it, thanks for the posts.