Quantum of Solace
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 08 6:12 pmGoing to see it in a couple of hours, I'll let you know how it goes.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 08 6:12 pmPosted: Sun Nov 09, 08 7:00 pmI'm gonna see it on wednesday midnight I guess
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 08 10:32 pmIts better than Casino Royale, which was shite.
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 12:09 amI thought it felt like more of a Bond film than Casino Royale.
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 2:03 amCasino Royale was the best bond film since Goldeneye
And if you want to argue against the above, please don't use the "butz he's blond yo yo"
And if you want to argue against the above, please don't use the "butz he's blond yo yo"
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 2:40 amGoldeneye was shit sorry
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 3:10 amcataclyzm wrote:Goldeneye was shit sorry
ROFL
I guess maybe I think its good is because it was pierce brosnans only good bond film, it had sean bean in it, and the n64 game made it nostalgically immense
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 3:43 amN64 was way better
The movie part of it had too many puns, goddamn Alan Cumming and his goddamn annoying personality.
It was a great movie, but not a great "Bond" movie.
The movie part of it had too many puns, goddamn Alan Cumming and his goddamn annoying personality.
It was a great movie, but not a great "Bond" movie.
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 6:37 amMy preferred option involves Sean Bean. Your argument is invalid.
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 7:36 amOdysseus from Troy
ODYSSEUS GODDAMMIT
ODYSSEUS GODDAMMIT
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 11:44 amBoromir!
And the guy from Ronin
The guy from Silent Hill (Useless character, but Bean still did something with him, although they could have cast him in a harry mason role and made him the main character)
Seriously one of the better british actors of the middle aged generation
And the guy from Ronin
The guy from Silent Hill (Useless character, but Bean still did something with him, although they could have cast him in a harry mason role and made him the main character)
Seriously one of the better british actors of the middle aged generation
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 3:13 pmMrBlack wrote:Casino Royale was the best bond film since Goldeneye
And if you want to argue against the above, please don't use the "butz he's blond yo yo"
It was just an hour and a half of him running.
CRAZY GUY, RUN AFTER HIM.
GET IN THE EMBASSY, RUN AROUND IT.
FUEL TRUCK, RUN AFTER IT.
BLACK GUYS, RUN AFTER THEM.
It wasn't a good bond film, it wasn't a good film. It was as bad as Die Another Day.
Also Sean Bean is immense. Fuck yeah Martin in Oblivion.
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 8:28 pmYou forgot the rope bit
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 10:50 pmMrBlack wrote:Boromir!
And the guy from Ronin
The guy from Silent Hill (Useless character, but Bean still did something with him, although they could have cast him in a harry mason role and made him the main character)
Seriously one of the better british actors of the middle aged generation
Its a shame that he'll always be remembered as the evil hollywood brit or "that guy".
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 08 10:59 pmSnakey wrote:MrBlack wrote:Boromir!
And the guy from Ronin
The guy from Silent Hill (Useless character, but Bean still did something with him, although they could have cast him in a harry mason role and made him the main character)
Seriously one of the better british actors of the middle aged generation
Its a shame that he'll always be remembered as the evil hollywood brit or "that guy".
He does evil so well though, well, good but easily corrupted evil
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 08 7:38 pmGoing on midnight premier, sharing opinion tomorrow..
(I have a feeling that it's gonna be worse than Casino Royal =/ )
(I have a feeling that it's gonna be worse than Casino Royal =/ )
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 08 2:36 pmWeeeeeeeaaak....
It was a film with full of action but no story. It lacked humour and proper storyline, it was a major disappointment after Casino Royale. Action scenes reminded me of Bourne films but they were worse. I expected a much better film.
It was a film with full of action but no story. It lacked humour and proper storyline, it was a major disappointment after Casino Royale. Action scenes reminded me of Bourne films but they were worse. I expected a much better film.
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 08 10:25 pmThe main dastardly deed had less than 30 seconds screentime.
This was an all new low for James Bourne-I mean Bond.
Something tells me they were aiming for the teenage demographic rather than dedicated fans.
This was an all new low for James Bourne-I mean Bond.
Something tells me they were aiming for the teenage demographic rather than dedicated fans.
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 08 2:34 amThis is why the film didn't have a huge marketing campaign except TV spots and literally TV spots for selling TVs or sound systems. They knew it was going to suck, I seen it a mile away when no one was excited for it.
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 08 8:56 amI watched Casino Royale in the cinemas, and it was brilliant. Quantum of Solace continious from Casino Royale, first Bond film ever to do that. Anyways I wanted to watch it in cinema, but m8s aint got money to go.
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 08 8:49 pmThis looks like it's aiming for the teen demographic. Ironically, that turns me away immediately.
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 08 12:33 pmYou will never look at Volvic in the same way again, let me tell you that.