Shotgun Facelift wrote:Yet throwing dragons out of thin air at giant dogs stuck in a giant dog house whilst teamed up with a black man who is wider than he is tall with mini guns as arms is best franchise ever?

Unlike you, I've actually played a good amount of the game I'm bagging.
Still trying to figure out where you got the dogs from though... maybe they exist in 'Moshie land'...

(Not to be confused with 'Yoshie'... or is it?!)
CP wrote:The graphics dont look any different than on the X-360,non-impressive indeed,i knew PS3 was overated.
S'cuse me for pointing this out...
But if the graphics look like the 360, and you're saying the PS3 is over-rated, doesn't that make the 360 over-rated also?
Just help me clear up your logic...
Side note; I find it funny that the graphics look as good as the 360's when SO much was made (mostly by X-box fanboys, who are mostly thick as bricks) out of the nVidia chip going into the PS3. If you belived the X-box fanboys, the nVidia wouldn't be able to provide anything near the 360's OMG WTF BBQ 1337'ness.
Some one called it yonks ago, both consoles are going to be about the same in spec levels, and it'll be the other factors that sway people. Like the network play available on both consoles.
(Which Sony is revamping.)
Personally, I'll always be a PlayStation fan because I find the shit being put out on the X-box un-inspired, easy, and repetitive. And people thought the generic FPS hell after Half-life was bad....
(Look at an X-box game list for examples.)
Tant wrote:They copied Xbox with the cheap and expensive packs
And Microsoft copied Sony by getting in to this industry... so whats your point?