Halo 3 Ending Leaked

Share your opinions and questions about anything to do with gaming and technology.

Moderator: Forum Guards

Postby C:Enter:£££ » Sat Jul 08, 06 12:28 am

I agree with DK on alot of point son his post lol yeh they are both round about the same power, 360 has advantages in parts, ps3 in others blah blah blah who gives a shit if they copied them in making a cheap and expensive versioon? the big dog i was talking about is that one in final fantasy seven where you have to fiht an over sized dog in a giant dog house with his arms breaking out and you havr to fight it like 10times just passing thorugh that area lol pisse dme off so much.
User avatar
C:Enter:£££
Forum Legend
 
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 03 10:38 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby Cureless_Poison » Sat Jul 08, 06 4:06 am

Darkknight wrote:
CP wrote:The graphics dont look any different than on the X-360,non-impressive indeed,i knew PS3 was overated.


S'cuse me for pointing this out...

But if the graphics look like the 360, and you're saying the PS3 is over-rated, doesn't that make the 360 over-rated also?

Just help me clear up your logic...



No cause MS didnt brag its the best thing even and be all secretive about it,Sony's making it sound like being touched by god or something,and they wont release the specs to anyone cause it probly sucks.
User avatar
Cureless_Poison
Master
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 04 12:29 am
Location: BC, Canada.

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 4:35 am

Cureless_Poison wrote:
Darkknight wrote:
CP wrote:The graphics dont look any different than on the X-360,non-impressive indeed,i knew PS3 was overated.


S'cuse me for pointing this out...

But if the graphics look like the 360, and you're saying the PS3 is over-rated, doesn't that make the 360 over-rated also?

Just help me clear up your logic...



No cause MS didnt brag its the best thing even and be all secretive about it,Sony's making it sound like being touched by god or something,and they wont release the specs to anyone cause it probly sucks.


Apparently you haven't been paying attention.

They've released the specs, DK posted them a while back in this topic.

Also, if you're talking about Sony being smug, look at microsoft :] Bill Gates, richest man in the world :] Releasing H3 a bit after Sony PS3 to steal it's thunder :] Donating 1/30 of his money to charity :] do i have to say more?
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby Big Daddy » Sat Jul 08, 06 8:32 am

People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."

1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.

2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.

3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)

PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.
A CNN reporter, while interviewing a Marine Sniper, asked. "What do you feel when you shoot a terrorist?"
The Marine shrugged and replied, "Recoil."
Image
Sig by Protocol but I did help.....I gave him the render if that counts as something.
User avatar
Big Daddy
Forum Hero
 
Posts: 2186
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 05 7:54 am
Location: In Rapture, looking for Her.

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:35 am

±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."

1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.

2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.

3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)

PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.


Apparently you're mentally disfigured.

1. Microsoft, in fact, never check any game by another company other than Microsoft Studios for the Xbox. Also, shitty as PS2 games can be, they make more than Xbox games do :]

2. Yes, that's true. But what the hell does it have to do with anything? Bigger isn't always better :]

3. Consoles aren't computers at all you dolt. Sony makes electronics of course, Microsoft seems to be lacking in that criteria :] Also, what the hell do you expect from a stereo, a 5.2 ghz 2gb ram?

4. Bill Gates has 50 something billion dollars. He has donated 28 billion to various charities and humanitarian efforts. He has also donated parts of this money to scientific research.

Now for the bad side.
About half a year, he makes more 500,000 dollars. That means with money, he can invest in his own corporation, increasing his money in 2008. He is considered a philantrophist, but not a great one.

As for not stealing Sony's thunder, here's a direct quote from Wikipedia:

Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, stated in a May 2005 Time Magazine interview that Halo 3 would be released as close to the PlayStation 3's launch as possible, to divert sales.


Want more:

A direct quote from the gateman himself:

It's perfect, the day Sony launches [the new PlayStation], they walk right into Halo 3.


I see your point, but you fail to back it up with actual evidence.
Last edited by clyzm on Sat Jul 08, 06 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby Cureless_Poison » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:36 am

±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."

1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.

2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.

3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)

PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.


All hail bill gates :P ha has a company worth over 168 billion dollars and has enough money to claim his own planet,if i ever meet him,i will treat him like god,id love to be his son :D
User avatar
Cureless_Poison
Master
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 04 12:29 am
Location: BC, Canada.

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:38 am

Cureless_Poison wrote:
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."

1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.

2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.


3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)

PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.


All hail bill gates :P ha has a company worth over 168 billion dollars and has enough money to claim his own planet,if i ever meet him,i will treat him like god,id love to be his son :D


How misdriven you are. Do you rely on the media 100% :lol:
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby Cureless_Poison » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:41 am

chococataclyzm wrote:
Cureless_Poison wrote:
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."

1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.

2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.


3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)

PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.


All hail bill gates :P ha has a company worth over 168 billion dollars and has enough money to claim his own planet,if i ever meet him,i will treat him like god,id love to be his son :D


How misdriven you are. Do you rely on the media 100% :lol:


No actually,i barley listen to media,i listen to clear legal facts,and whats the news says about him sometimes :P if it wasent for Bill Gates,i would probly have died by now.
User avatar
Cureless_Poison
Master
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 04 12:29 am
Location: BC, Canada.

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:42 am

And where do you get your clear, legal facts from? The media? :roll:
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby Cureless_Poison » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:49 am

chococataclyzm wrote:And where do you get your clear, legal facts from? The media? :roll:


Yeah probly,i dont know,i dont care,but i do know they did a study,if bill gates put all the money he has under his bed,if he fell out of bed,it would take him,aproximetly 18 minutes to hit the floor. :lol:
User avatar
Cureless_Poison
Master
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 04 12:29 am
Location: BC, Canada.

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:53 am

Cureless_Poison wrote:
chococataclyzm wrote:And where do you get your clear, legal facts from? The media? :roll:


Yeah probly,i dont know,i dont care,but i do know they did a study,if bill gates put all the money he has under his bed,if he fell out of bed,it would take him,aproximetly 18 minutes to hit the floor. :lol:


Rockefeller is the richest man in the entire world ... not Gates. Well, he's not alive like Gates, but he was the richest man.
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby DarkKnight » Sat Jul 08, 06 10:16 am

I'll sum up mah views. Feel free to disagree.

As far as online content goes, I understand why people like the Live! service, it offers great simplicity and gives you a range of games to play on, however it has it's down falls, which also happen to be the Playstation's up sides.

It took a new generation of consoles for Microsoft to figure out console gamers would want to play the same game with their PC pals. The X-box 360 allows this (See; FFXI), however the PS2 allowed this from the start.
(Over all I prefer the PC for online play. But I use a PS2 style controller in FFXI.)

Games, well they're a matter of choice, and it's the main reason I choose the Playstation brand. It simply has games that cater to my taste, like the .Hack// series, FF's(der), Shadow Hearts, GT3/4, GTA's, Front Mission's, Amoured Core's, Harvest Moon's, etc.(Really looking forward to the Gundam game, MECH'S! WOO!)

I love a good bash around as much as the next bloke, but after a full day of FPS', I'm not too keen to play them for a few days. In contrast, I can spend days playing RPG's.

Hardware is also a matter of choice. In this area I find the Sony solution much more to my likeing. I also like the fact that the chip required innovation and a new look at a common problem. The X-box 360, in my view, is exactly like the X-box; a Shuttle in a pretty case. There is PC hardware in there, Microsoft didn't have to innovate at all, they just took the brute force route. The Cell (Sony/IBM/Toshiba project) is a more elegent design that requires less power to match the 360, which again I find more appealing. Basically the same reason I'll always reccomend AMD's vs Intel's.

I'm an extremely loyal customer, but only if it goes both ways. The Playstation developers, both software and hardware, havent let me down yet, and I doubt they really could.

Moshie wrote:the big dog i was talking about is that one in final fantasy seven where you have to fiht an over sized dog in a giant dog house with his arms breaking out and you havr to fight it like 10times just passing thorugh that area lol pisse dme off so much.


Ahhh I know the area.

You escort Aerith back home, iirc.
Image
I'm a lover, that's why I do this posting.
I don't need the forum,
I do it to save you ignorant bastards from your self.
User avatar
DarkKnight
Forum Super Hero
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 03 10:01 am
Location: Under the bridge.

Postby Big Daddy » Sat Jul 08, 06 10:37 am

Ok, cool those are indeed your views and I agree with most of them but Playstation Net isn't well-known. To prove this I asked 5 of my friends who love PS2 and I asked do they know what Playstation Net is and 4 said "Dunno" and one said "the sony website" ¬_¬'.



Also Bill Gates is the richest man in history but his wealth goes up and down because he puts money in the Tele-Market.

Consider that he made this money in the 25 years or so since Microsoft was founded in 1975. If you presume that he has worked 14 hours a day on every business day of the year since then, that means he's been making money at a staggering million dollars per hour, around $300 per second.



Another way to examine this sort of wealth is to compare it to yours. Consider an average American of modest wealth. Perhaps she has a net worth of $70,000. Mr. Gates' worth is 800,000 times larger. Which means that if something costs $100,000 to her, to Bill it's as though it costs 12 cents. You can work out the right multiplier for your own net worth.


So for example, you might think a new Lambourghini Diablo would cost $250,000, but in Bill Gates dollars that's 31 cents.

That fully loaded, multimedia active matrix 233 MHZ laptop with the 1024x768 screen you've been drooling after? Half a penny.

A nice home in a rich town like Palo Alto, California? Two dollars. That nice mansion he's building? A more reasonable $63 to him.



That sounds rich to me!
A CNN reporter, while interviewing a Marine Sniper, asked. "What do you feel when you shoot a terrorist?"
The Marine shrugged and replied, "Recoil."
Image
Sig by Protocol but I did help.....I gave him the render if that counts as something.
User avatar
Big Daddy
Forum Hero
 
Posts: 2186
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 05 7:54 am
Location: In Rapture, looking for Her.

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 10:46 am

±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:Ok, cool those are indeed your views and I agree with most of them but Playstation Net isn't well-known. To prove this I asked 5 of my friends who love PS2 and I asked do they know what Playstation Net is and 4 said "Dunno" and one said "the sony website" ¬_¬'.



Also Bill Gates is the richest man in history but his wealth goes up and down because he puts money in the Tele-Market.

Consider that he made this money in the 25 years or so since Microsoft was founded in 1975. If you presume that he has worked 14 hours a day on every business day of the year since then, that means he's been making money at a staggering million dollars per hour, around $300 per second.



Another way to examine this sort of wealth is to compare it to yours. Consider an average American of modest wealth. Perhaps she has a net worth of $70,000. Mr. Gates' worth is 800,000 times larger. Which means that if something costs $100,000 to her, to Bill it's as though it costs 12 cents. You can work out the right multiplier for your own net worth.


So for example, you might think a new Lambourghini Diablo would cost $250,000, but in Bill Gates dollars that's 31 cents.

That fully loaded, multimedia active matrix 233 MHZ laptop with the 1024x768 screen you've been drooling after? Half a penny.

A nice home in a rich town like Palo Alto, California? Two dollars. That nice mansion he's building? A more reasonable $63 to him.



That sounds rich to me!


First theory is wrong.

You say that he makes 1 million per hour, however WikiPedia says:

Annual salary: US$1 million[1]


He makes a million per year.

Also, Rockefeller was worth about $200 mill in mid 1910s. Consider inflation afterwards, and you've got the richest man who ever lived :]
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby Big Daddy » Sat Jul 08, 06 10:48 am

It depends on the success of the company really. I mean he used to be worth $200 billion until he started xbox I think. Rockefeller is dead! Which means his fortune is no longer existant is therefore not the richest man alive
A CNN reporter, while interviewing a Marine Sniper, asked. "What do you feel when you shoot a terrorist?"
The Marine shrugged and replied, "Recoil."
Image
Sig by Protocol but I did help.....I gave him the render if that counts as something.
User avatar
Big Daddy
Forum Hero
 
Posts: 2186
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 05 7:54 am
Location: In Rapture, looking for Her.

Postby DarkKnight » Sat Jul 08, 06 11:17 am

±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:It depends on the success of the company really. I mean he used to be worth $200 billion until he started xbox I think. Rockefeller is dead! Which means his fortune is no longer existant is therefore not the richest man alive


Bill Gates is a blight on softwares good name.

Money, power, and ego doesn't change this fact.
Image
I'm a lover, that's why I do this posting.
I don't need the forum,
I do it to save you ignorant bastards from your self.
User avatar
DarkKnight
Forum Super Hero
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 03 10:01 am
Location: Under the bridge.

Postby Big Daddy » Sat Jul 08, 06 3:04 pm

Why are we talking about the world's richest nerd?
A CNN reporter, while interviewing a Marine Sniper, asked. "What do you feel when you shoot a terrorist?"
The Marine shrugged and replied, "Recoil."
Image
Sig by Protocol but I did help.....I gave him the render if that counts as something.
User avatar
Big Daddy
Forum Hero
 
Posts: 2186
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 05 7:54 am
Location: In Rapture, looking for Her.

Postby DarkKnight » Sat Jul 08, 06 4:15 pm

±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:Why are we talking about the world's richest nerd?


Dez is trying to find good in the worlds most evil company.

However, he fails, as he has been forced to use Microsoft products in the past, and thus is scared for life.

Please don't call Bill Gates a nerd though, it's an insult to all those bloody smart and good nerds out there.
(Alternate names I suggest; Billy boy, Billy G, Satan's bosum buddy, etc.)
Image
I'm a lover, that's why I do this posting.
I don't need the forum,
I do it to save you ignorant bastards from your self.
User avatar
DarkKnight
Forum Super Hero
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 03 10:01 am
Location: Under the bridge.

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:47 pm

DarkKnight wrote:
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:Why are we talking about the world's richest nerd?


Dez is trying to find good in the worlds most evil company.

However, he fails, as he has been forced to use Microsoft products in the past, and thus is scared for life.

Please don't call Bill Gates a nerd though, it's an insult to all those bloody smart and good nerds out there.
(Alternate names I suggest; Billy boy, Billy G, Satan's bosum buddy, etc.)


I'm talking to you through a Microsoft product...

Hmm ... but the comp says Sony. What the fuck? A Sony Microsoft Windows? O_O

Sony and Microsoft should merge, making Sonysoft O_O
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby Snakey » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:51 pm

Microsony!
<center>

Image
User avatar
Snakey
Alpha
 
Posts: 3926
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 05 7:09 pm
Location: Wales

Postby C:Enter:£££ » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:52 pm

Or not, Sony blow more cock than a £5 whore. I prefer my things to last longer than 2days past the warranty date.
User avatar
C:Enter:£££
Forum Legend
 
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 03 10:38 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:56 pm

Shotgun Facelift wrote:Or not, Sony blow more cock than a £5 whore. I prefer my things to last longer than 2days past the warranty date.


Not ALL of Sony is shit...
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby C:Enter:£££ » Sat Jul 08, 06 9:59 pm

Everything I've owned bearing the Sony logo has literally fallen apart like sand days after warranty lol
User avatar
C:Enter:£££
Forum Legend
 
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 03 10:38 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby clyzm » Sat Jul 08, 06 10:04 pm

lies.

I've had this Sony computer for 4 years and it's in mint condition.
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

Postby C:Enter:£££ » Sat Jul 08, 06 10:14 pm

Well that's you, and your fake Sony merch lol Cheap nockoffs in the market.
User avatar
C:Enter:£££
Forum Legend
 
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 03 10:38 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby DarkKnight » Sun Jul 09, 06 10:14 am

Shotgun Facelift wrote:Everything I've owned bearing the Sony logo has literally fallen apart like sand days after warranty lol


I had a PS2 for years, it got dropped, packed, moved many times, and still kept kicking. Only scar it had was the tray would make a bit of noise as it went in or out, but other then that, it worked a treat.
Image
I'm a lover, that's why I do this posting.
I don't need the forum,
I do it to save you ignorant bastards from your self.
User avatar
DarkKnight
Forum Super Hero
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 03 10:01 am
Location: Under the bridge.

Postby Cureless_Poison » Sun Jul 09, 06 10:26 am

Sony sucks balls for gaming purpous's,i only use electronic utility's like DVD player,VCR that sorta shit.
User avatar
Cureless_Poison
Master
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 04 12:29 am
Location: BC, Canada.

Postby C:Enter:£££ » Sun Jul 09, 06 11:47 am

DarkKnight wrote:I had a PS2 for years, it got dropped, packed, moved many times, and still kept kicking. Only scar it had was the tray would make a bit of noise as it went in or out, but other then that, it worked a treat.


My PS2 felt like breaking the disc tray on day 1 and V1 PS2's either are broke or cannot play multilayer discs :shock: SHODDY! lol Only good thing they ever created was PS1 8)
User avatar
C:Enter:£££
Forum Legend
 
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 03 10:38 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby DarkKnight » Sun Jul 09, 06 12:37 pm

Cureless_Poison wrote:Sony sucks balls for gaming purpous's,i only use electronic utility's like DVD player,VCR that sorta shit.


State your sources.

My PS2 felt like breaking the disc tray on day 1 and V1 PS2's either are broke or cannot play multilayer discs :shock: SHODDY! lol Only good thing they ever created was PS1 8)


The funny thing is, I had more trouble with my PS1 then I did my Ps2.

Mind you, Australia is lucky. We get all the stuff after the companies fix the version 1 problems. :lol:
(No 360 over-heating issue in Aussie-land, cept the ones you get from 40c days.)
Image
I'm a lover, that's why I do this posting.
I don't need the forum,
I do it to save you ignorant bastards from your self.
User avatar
DarkKnight
Forum Super Hero
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 03 10:01 am
Location: Under the bridge.

Postby clyzm » Sun Jul 09, 06 3:38 pm

DarkKnight wrote:
Cureless_Poison wrote:Sony sucks balls for gaming purpous's,i only use electronic utility's like DVD player,VCR that sorta shit.


State your sources.

My PS2 felt like breaking the disc tray on day 1 and V1 PS2's either are broke or cannot play multilayer discs :shock: SHODDY! lol Only good thing they ever created was PS1 8)


The funny thing is, I had more trouble with my PS1 then I did my Ps2.

Mind you, Australia is lucky. We get all the stuff after the companies fix the version 1 problems. :lol:
(No 360 over-heating issue in Aussie-land, cept the ones you get from 40c days.)


You can buy a cooler for the X360 for around $200.
Image
User avatar
clyzm
Forum Master God
 
Posts: 16023
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 04 2:48 am
Location: Chiraq

PreviousNext

Return to Gaming and Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests
cron