Moderator: Forum Guards
Darkknight wrote:CP wrote:The graphics dont look any different than on the X-360,non-impressive indeed,i knew PS3 was overated.
S'cuse me for pointing this out...
But if the graphics look like the 360, and you're saying the PS3 is over-rated, doesn't that make the 360 over-rated also?
Just help me clear up your logic...
Cureless_Poison wrote:Darkknight wrote:CP wrote:The graphics dont look any different than on the X-360,non-impressive indeed,i knew PS3 was overated.
S'cuse me for pointing this out...
But if the graphics look like the 360, and you're saying the PS3 is over-rated, doesn't that make the 360 over-rated also?
Just help me clear up your logic...
No cause MS didnt brag its the best thing even and be all secretive about it,Sony's making it sound like being touched by god or something,and they wont release the specs to anyone cause it probly sucks.
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."
1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.
2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.
3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)
PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.
Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, stated in a May 2005 Time Magazine interview that Halo 3 would be released as close to the PlayStation 3's launch as possible, to divert sales.
It's perfect, the day Sony launches [the new PlayStation], they walk right into Halo 3.
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."
1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.
2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.
3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)
PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.
Cureless_Poison wrote:±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."
1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.
2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.
3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)
PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.
All hail bill gatesha has a company worth over 168 billion dollars and has enough money to claim his own planet,if i ever meet him,i will treat him like god,id love to be his son
chococataclyzm wrote:Cureless_Poison wrote:±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:People always say "Xbox 360 will never beat PS3 because PS3 are better at making consoles."
1.Sony put any old shitty game onto it to get sales. Whereas MicroSoft check every single game personally.
2.MicroSoft are the richest corporation in the world and have taken over the market in computers.
3.Consoles are just like computers and Sony make T.V's and Mobiles with hardly any memory (my Sony Ericsson V600i)
PS:Bill Gates just donated 9 billion dollars to Live 8.
Xbox didn't try to steal thunder because they announced it first, I checked on the SOny website when the xbox 360 was announced and I searched for PS3 and came up with nothin.
All hail bill gatesha has a company worth over 168 billion dollars and has enough money to claim his own planet,if i ever meet him,i will treat him like god,id love to be his son
How misdriven you are. Do you rely on the media 100%
chococataclyzm wrote:And where do you get your clear, legal facts from? The media?
Cureless_Poison wrote:chococataclyzm wrote:And where do you get your clear, legal facts from? The media?
Yeah probly,i dont know,i dont care,but i do know they did a study,if bill gates put all the money he has under his bed,if he fell out of bed,it would take him,aproximetly 18 minutes to hit the floor.
Moshie wrote:the big dog i was talking about is that one in final fantasy seven where you have to fiht an over sized dog in a giant dog house with his arms breaking out and you havr to fight it like 10times just passing thorugh that area lol pisse dme off so much.
Consider that he made this money in the 25 years or so since Microsoft was founded in 1975. If you presume that he has worked 14 hours a day on every business day of the year since then, that means he's been making money at a staggering million dollars per hour, around $300 per second.
Another way to examine this sort of wealth is to compare it to yours. Consider an average American of modest wealth. Perhaps she has a net worth of $70,000. Mr. Gates' worth is 800,000 times larger. Which means that if something costs $100,000 to her, to Bill it's as though it costs 12 cents. You can work out the right multiplier for your own net worth.
So for example, you might think a new Lambourghini Diablo would cost $250,000, but in Bill Gates dollars that's 31 cents.
That fully loaded, multimedia active matrix 233 MHZ laptop with the 1024x768 screen you've been drooling after? Half a penny.
A nice home in a rich town like Palo Alto, California? Two dollars. That nice mansion he's building? A more reasonable $63 to him.
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:Ok, cool those are indeed your views and I agree with most of them but Playstation Net isn't well-known. To prove this I asked 5 of my friends who love PS2 and I asked do they know what Playstation Net is and 4 said "Dunno" and one said "the sony website" ¬_¬'.
Also Bill Gates is the richest man in history but his wealth goes up and down because he puts money in the Tele-Market.Consider that he made this money in the 25 years or so since Microsoft was founded in 1975. If you presume that he has worked 14 hours a day on every business day of the year since then, that means he's been making money at a staggering million dollars per hour, around $300 per second.Another way to examine this sort of wealth is to compare it to yours. Consider an average American of modest wealth. Perhaps she has a net worth of $70,000. Mr. Gates' worth is 800,000 times larger. Which means that if something costs $100,000 to her, to Bill it's as though it costs 12 cents. You can work out the right multiplier for your own net worth.
So for example, you might think a new Lambourghini Diablo would cost $250,000, but in Bill Gates dollars that's 31 cents.
That fully loaded, multimedia active matrix 233 MHZ laptop with the 1024x768 screen you've been drooling after? Half a penny.
A nice home in a rich town like Palo Alto, California? Two dollars. That nice mansion he's building? A more reasonable $63 to him.
That sounds rich to me!
Annual salary: US$1 million[1]
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:It depends on the success of the company really. I mean he used to be worth $200 billion until he started xbox I think. Rockefeller is dead! Which means his fortune is no longer existant is therefore not the richest man alive
±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:Why are we talking about the world's richest nerd?
DarkKnight wrote:±Tantalus[AW]± wrote:Why are we talking about the world's richest nerd?
Dez is trying to find good in the worlds most evil company.
However, he fails, as he has been forced to use Microsoft products in the past, and thus is scared for life.
Please don't call Bill Gates a nerd though, it's an insult to all those bloody smart and good nerds out there.
(Alternate names I suggest; Billy boy, Billy G, Satan's bosum buddy, etc.)
Shotgun Facelift wrote:Or not, Sony blow more cock than a £5 whore. I prefer my things to last longer than 2days past the warranty date.
Shotgun Facelift wrote:Everything I've owned bearing the Sony logo has literally fallen apart like sand days after warranty lol
DarkKnight wrote:I had a PS2 for years, it got dropped, packed, moved many times, and still kept kicking. Only scar it had was the tray would make a bit of noise as it went in or out, but other then that, it worked a treat.
Cureless_Poison wrote:Sony sucks balls for gaming purpous's,i only use electronic utility's like DVD player,VCR that sorta shit.
My PS2 felt like breaking the disc tray on day 1 and V1 PS2's either are broke or cannot play multilayer discsSHODDY! lol Only good thing they ever created was PS1
DarkKnight wrote:Cureless_Poison wrote:Sony sucks balls for gaming purpous's,i only use electronic utility's like DVD player,VCR that sorta shit.
State your sources.My PS2 felt like breaking the disc tray on day 1 and V1 PS2's either are broke or cannot play multilayer discsSHODDY! lol Only good thing they ever created was PS1
The funny thing is, I had more trouble with my PS1 then I did my Ps2.
Mind you, Australia is lucky. We get all the stuff after the companies fix the version 1 problems.![]()
(No 360 over-heating issue in Aussie-land, cept the ones you get from 40c days.)