Deus Ex Alpha • View topic

by **Siva** » Sun Dec 07, 08 8:12 pm

Well, we should probably just stop calling the COD games by numbers after 3, since IW is doing Modern Warfare 2 (The only logical choice. Future gaem would be silly)

Pissing a little bit in Treyarchs mouth as a result, not even giving COD:WaW a year to be the newest Call of Duty

Activision has named practically its entire 2009 line-up at an in-game advertiser meeting, including Infinity Ward's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

Speaking at an 'upfront' meeting with in-game ad company Massive Inc. (responsible for the famous Obama Burnout Paradise ad), Activision named its 2009 games including tentatively titled Guitar Hero 5, a new Tony Hawk's and Modern Warfare 2.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/ar ... 4&site=cvg

by **xProtocol Rain** » Sun Dec 07, 08 8:31 pm

sounds cool.

by **Tonnochi** » Mon Dec 08, 08 12:35 am

WaW was basically Battlefield Vietnam's WWII Mod. Maybe that's why they're moving on.

by **James** » Mon Dec 08, 08 12:47 am

No, they already moved on with Modern Warfare, Activision are greedy bastards so they're going to release a COD every year with two different development teams.

Anyone here who fell for World At War is fucking stupid, as evidenced by this announcement. If you dare fall for World at War 2 in 2010 I'm banning you for 2 months.

by **Zantinzuken** » Mon Dec 08, 08 12:48 am

Unless it's a new engine or something to that effect I can't be arsed, doesn't appear to much in difference between the last two games anyway...

by **Mr. Tastix** » Mon Dec 08, 08 1:54 am

James wrote:No, they already moved on with Modern Warfare, Activision are greedy bastards so they're going to release a COD every year with two different development teams.

Anyone here who fell for World At War is fucking stupid, as evidenced by this announcement. If you dare fall for World at War 2 in 2010 I'm banning you for 2 months.

To be honest, I find it a bit overboard to ban someone for a game you dislike. Just because we're on a forum doesn't mean I have any less rights to buy whatever the fuck I like.

In saying that, whoever does buy it actually deserves to be banned because you're a fucking idiot if you do. Seriously, what dumbass would buy the EXACT SAME FUCKING GAME EVERY GODDAMN FUCKING YEAR!?

by **xProtocol Rain** » Mon Dec 08, 08 6:16 am

~Psychotic~ wrote:To be honest, I find it a bit overboard to ban someone for a game you dislike. Just because we're on a forum doesn't mean I have any less rights to buy whatever the fuck I like.

Took the words right outta my mouth.

~Psychotic~ wrote:In saying that, whoever does buy it actually deserves to be banned because you're a fucking idiot if you do. Seriously, what dumbass would buy the EXACT SAME FUCKING GAME EVERY GODDAMN FUCKING YEAR!?

And yet at the same time it seems like your agreeing with Jay to an extent. I believe no one deserves to be banned no matter what they buy. In fact it shouldn't even matter to anyone on this forum what game you buy. I swear you guys take this shit too seriously..

by **Mr. Tastix** » Mon Dec 08, 08 8:17 am

KyLe Iz SiK wrote:
~Psychotic~ wrote:To be honest, I find it a bit overboard to ban someone for a game you dislike. Just because we're on a forum doesn't mean I have any less rights to buy whatever the fuck I like.

Took the words right outta my mouth.

~Psychotic~ wrote:In saying that, whoever does buy it actually deserves to be banned because you're a fucking idiot if you do. Seriously, what dumbass would buy the EXACT SAME FUCKING GAME EVERY GODDAMN FUCKING YEAR!?

And yet at the same time it seems like your agreeing with Jay to an extent. I believe no one deserves to be banned no matter what they buy. In fact it shouldn't even matter to anyone on this forum what game you buy. I swear you guys take this shit too seriously..

I agree with what he says to a certain degree. I don't think anyone should be banned for buying a game, but I do think you're an idiot if you buy ANOTHER stupid Call of Duty game.

All you'd be doing is wasting your money, and your time. But of course there will be some fanboys out there who think that the light shines out of Activisions ass.

Well NEWSFLASH for you: IT DOES NOT. All they want is your damn money. JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER COMPANY IN THE WORLD.

by **James** » Mon Dec 08, 08 10:44 am

~Psychotic~
KyLe Iz SiK

Due to these positive reactions I'm banning anyone who buys a sequel ever, thanks.

by **Mr. Tastix** » Mon Dec 08, 08 11:41 am

Lol, do whatever you like. You're the admin, just don't expect to get fame, fortune and love out of it. I couldn't care less what you do so long as I'm not banned. And because I'll never buy Call of Duty then I'm fine.

That and anyone stupid enough to say that got Call of Duty: Modern Warface 2 after you just gave that statement would, at least in my opinion, deserve to be banned. Because that's stupidity in it's purest form.

EDIT: Abuse of power anyone LOL. Ownage.

by **James** » Mon Dec 08, 08 11:57 am

im gonna ban you im gonna ban you

by **Mr. Tastix** » Mon Dec 08, 08 12:10 pm

James wrote:im gonna ban you im gonna ban you

Hey man, I'm on your side lol. Direct your hatred towards the CoD fanboys.

by **James** » Mon Dec 08, 08 12:14 pm

I don't know what to believe anymore, Slipknot are touring with Coheed.

by **Mr. Tastix** » Mon Dec 08, 08 12:22 pm

James wrote:I don't know what to believe anymore, Slipknot are touring with Coheed.

LMFAO WTF?! Meh, doesn't matter to me. I don't really like either band.

by **xProtocol Rain** » Mon Dec 08, 08 9:59 pm

James wrote:Due to these positive reactions I'm banning anyone who buys a sequel ever, thanks.

You gotta love Alpha's operators..... :roll:

by **James** » Mon Dec 08, 08 10:07 pm

KyLe Iz SiK wrote:
James wrote:Due to these positive reactions I'm banning anyone who buys a sequel ever, thanks.

You gotta love Alpha's operators.....

I'm not even... ... ... LOL

by **Tonnochi** » Mon Dec 08, 08 10:13 pm

Alternative: He could have been joking?

by **Siva** » Mon Dec 08, 08 10:13 pm

This thread has devolved into retardery

COD:WaW was a good game, anyone that tries to shit on it is also saying Battlefield 2142, Left 4 Dead, and San Andreas are bad games for the same reason

by **clyzm** » Mon Dec 08, 08 10:40 pm

James is kidding

He is kidding goddammit

He won't ban anyone

Goddamn it people take the interwebs too seriously

by **Mr. Tastix** » Mon Dec 08, 08 11:45 pm

Lol, we know that. It's just funny to think that he would ban people, and San Andreas and Battlefield/CoD have nothing in common. How can you compare the two? One is a sandbox game and the other two are war games they are all pretty much the same anyway.

The only comparison is you can use guns in both games. WOW HOW SIMILAR. I also think San Andreas is set in the 90s, not 2142.

by **James** » Tue Dec 09, 08 1:47 am

Protocol wrote:This thread has devolved into retardery

COD:WaW was a good game, anyone that tries to shit on it is also saying Battlefield 2142, Left 4 Dead, and San Andreas are bad games for the same reason

Battlefield: Bad Company is one of the worse games in existence.

by **Mr. Tastix** » Tue Dec 09, 08 2:38 am

James wrote:
Protocol wrote:This thread has devolved into retardery

COD:WaW was a good game, anyone that tries to shit on it is also saying Battlefield 2142, Left 4 Dead, and San Andreas are bad games for the same reason

Battlefield: Bad Company is one of the worse games in existence.

To be honest, the only Battlefield game I've ever liked was 1942, I didn't mind 2 but if BF1942 is anything to go on, the damage calculator and AI would be fucked in that one too anyway.

by **Tonnochi** » Tue Dec 09, 08 4:50 am

~Psychotic~ wrote:
James wrote:
Protocol wrote:This thread has devolved into retardery

COD:WaW was a good game, anyone that tries to shit on it is also saying Battlefield 2142, Left 4 Dead, and San Andreas are bad games for the same reason

Battlefield: Bad Company is one of the worse games in existence.

To be honest, the only Battlefield game I've ever liked was 1942, I didn't mind 2 but if BF1942 is anything to go on, the damage calculator and AI would be fucked in that one too anyway.

I fucking loved Vietnam.

by **Mr. Tastix** » Tue Dec 09, 08 6:06 am

Aaron wrote:
~Psychotic~ wrote:
James wrote:
Protocol wrote:This thread has devolved into retardery

COD:WaW was a good game, anyone that tries to shit on it is also saying Battlefield 2142, Left 4 Dead, and San Andreas are bad games for the same reason

Battlefield: Bad Company is one of the worse games in existence.

To be honest, the only Battlefield game I've ever liked was 1942, I didn't mind 2 but if BF1942 is anything to go on, the damage calculator and AI would be fucked in that one too anyway.

I fucking loved Vietnam.

Sorry, I should've explained further: Anything before BF2. I haven't tried Vietnam (was going to but someone got to it before I did) but I've heard it's good.

I didn't mind BF2 but I actually enjoy playing campaign/quick matches on BF1942 vs. the AI.

by **xProtocol Rain** » Tue Dec 09, 08 5:00 pm

James wrote:
KyLe Iz SiK wrote:
James wrote:Due to these positive reactions I'm banning anyone who buys a sequel ever, thanks.

You gotta love Alpha's operators.....

I'm not even... ... ... LOL

What? Go ahead. Say it.

by **James** » Tue Dec 09, 08 5:33 pm

... being serious.

by **xProtocol Rain** » Tue Dec 09, 08 6:00 pm

..... If there's something you have to say about me then be out with it.

by **James** » Tue Dec 09, 08 7:12 pm

lol what

by **xProtocol Rain** » Tue Dec 09, 08 7:29 pm

Nevermind dude.

Jesus Christ.....

by **Mr. Tastix** » Tue Dec 09, 08 8:27 pm

KyLe Iz SiK wrote::?..... If there's something you have to say about me then be out with it.

LOL, I got warned and even I knew he was joking. But still, I would've found it rather funny if someone had gotten banned for buying CoD.

I have now come to learn that most of the shit on this forum should be taken at face value, and with a grain of salt. A VERY LARGE GRAIN.

Modern Warfare 2

Modern Warfare 2

Who is online

Login

Deus Ex Network

Deus Ex: Revision