Moderator: Forum Guards
LTKJAY wrote:Theres an option to turn off most of the shitty bloom and blurring in options Dae on the PS3 version, IIRC.
Protocol wrote:LTKJAY wrote:Theres an option to turn off most of the shitty bloom and blurring in options Dae on the PS3 version, IIRC.
OPTIONS?
IN MY CONSOLE GAEM?
Zantinzuken wrote:Baleout wrote:Brakes, not breaks.
WAT
James wrote:Of course I do I'm living the dream!!!!
DJ wrote:wat dream
Chloe wrote:me, ofc
Dae wrote:I completed GTA IV.
Before I started playing it, I'd expected less from it, seeing there had been no praising comments in this thread (or I possibly missed them). I'll put it shortly, GTA IV is one of most enjoying gaming experiences I've had. Thank you Rockstar! When this game comes out for PC, I'll buy the legal box just to show my appreciation.
Most notable features of this game for me:
- Graphics. I'm suprised the game handles it all so well.
- Atmosphere. You can watch TV, browse the internet (with hell lot of sites, emails, spam etc), hear the news on the radio. Pedestrians answer their phones, etc.
- Detail. The devs are freaks! Many buildings are enterable; Niko can pronounce any street name when telling the cabman where to drive, you can change ringtone on your cellphone, play bowling, darts, get drunk; wash your car (remember, in GTA SA all cars were dirty) etc.
- AI. The drivers follow the rules, and as well try to avoid collisions / crashes even if you break rules of the road.
- Story. The story is pretty fine, except in the middle I had a feeling I killed *too* many people. I'd only wish that there were more dialogues, story line details, cutscenes. And yeah, good thing is that itsn't so linear as in SA.
- Weapons / action. In GTA SA weaps looked awful, sounded awful and their effect was awful (e.g. remember that stupid mission when you had to follow on a bike the train with 6 enemies standing on it). Weapons and "cover" ability in GTA IV were something that distracted me from the routine parts of the story.
- Car handling has been improved significantly (I take back my words from the last message in this thread). If you don't drive too fast, you'll most likely manage to avoid even small collisions. Handling is still far from perfection, though, and the main problem are brakes that hardly work.
Some "minuses":
- Brake don't brake, as I mentioned above.
- Blurring, bloom don't always make the graphics prettier.
- In certain places at certain moments fps noticeably decreases.
- In all games I played, Russians speak on Russian with horrible accent and all Russian signs / name are incredibly stupid. GTA IV is no exception (well, DJs / music on Vladivostok FM is real). Come on devs, hire real Russians / immigrants for dubbing and signsBut its really a minor issue, just I laughed when Dimitri tried to swear.
To summarize, Rockstar definitely learns on mistakes, and their definitely loved their work.
INTERCEPTION!!!LTKJAY wrote:PC version this November.
Posting this before Ruben.
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:INTERCEPTION!!!LTKJAY wrote:PC version this November.
Posting this before Ruben.
YOU SCUM.
22:37 - Resident PCFag: GTA IV PC
22:37 - Resident PCFag: CONFIRMED
22:38 - The Arbiter, now wiff 20% ROKKIN: oh right
22:38 - The Arbiter, now wiff 20% ROKKIN: you better post it on dxalpha
I'll never be a hype whore againPsykorgasm wrote:Shame the game isn't as good as I thought it was gonna be...
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:I'll never be a hype whore againPsykorgasm wrote:Shame the game isn't as good as I thought it was gonna be....
360:
1280 x 720 with 2 x AA and runs at around 29-30fps
Texture Quality = Medium
Render Quality = Low
View Distance = 21
Detail Distance = 10
Vehicle Density = 33
Shadow Density = Not available on the consoles
PS3:
1120 x 640 with no AA and is upscaled to 720p at around 29fps
Texture Quality = Medium
Render Quality = Low
View Distance = 21
Detail Distance = 10
Vehicle Density = 33
Shadow Density = Not available on the consoles
~þsÿçhø~ wrote:My laptops screen is broke, how can i fix it?
James wrote:THROW DARK SOULS AT IT
FRO_BELOW wrote:I still posit San Andreas was the best GTA so far.
FRO_BELOW wrote:I still posit San Andreas was the best GTA so far.
~þsÿçhø~ wrote:My laptops screen is broke, how can i fix it?
James wrote:THROW DARK SOULS AT IT
Definitely. Much, much, MUCH more variety in missions when compared to the uninspired "drive to location, shoot 5-10 guys, chase remainder/boss in car/bike/boat chase" formula of GTA IV.FRO_BELOW wrote:I still posit San Andreas was the best GTA so far.
Bob wrote:GTA 4 seemed to go on for ever. When you get fed up of doing missions and it starts to feel like a chore you know that the game is certainly not fun.
Story was far too long and there were few memorable missions. Certainly not the best GTA, that award still goes to Vice City in my opinion.
I'd probably say IV had the shortest storyline.FRO_BELOW wrote:Vice City was only decent on PC.
GTA 4 story was shorter than SA
Tantalus wrote:I'd probably say IV had the shortest storyline.FRO_BELOW wrote:Vice City was only decent on PC.
GTA 4 story was shorter than SA
@ Kyle, YESSIR. But THQ should have made a better PC port.